<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science in the news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sortingoutscience.net/2007/12/science_in_the_news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sortingoutscience.net/2007/12/science_in_the_news/</link>
	<description>Science for people who never knew it could be interesting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:32:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam Wise</title>
		<link>http://sortingoutscience.net/2007/12/science_in_the_news/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sortingoutscience.net/2007/12/11/science_in_the_news/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>The temperature spike in the 20&#039;s wasn&#039;t a global thing, it was a spike in local (to Greenland) temperatures.  I couldn&#039;t tell you what caused it -- maybe a change in ocean currents, maybe something else (local temperatures can be pretty variable).  The press release, at least, doesn&#039;t go into depth on this.

Then the end of this &quot;spike&quot; in the 40&#039;s was probably a mix of the local fluctuation going away, combined with the global leveling out of temperatures that hit around then (driven by a couple of big volcanic eruptions, and a big up-tick in industrial pollution).

The point of the article is that a slight increase in local temperature back in the 1920&#039;s caused a big loss of ice cover.  That being the case, the current warming is likely to do some serious damage to the Greenland ice cap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The temperature spike in the 20&#8217;s wasn&#8217;t a global thing, it was a spike in local (to Greenland) temperatures.  I couldn&#8217;t tell you what caused it &#8212; maybe a change in ocean currents, maybe something else (local temperatures can be pretty variable).  The press release, at least, doesn&#8217;t go into depth on this.</p>
<p>Then the end of this &#8220;spike&#8221; in the 40&#8217;s was probably a mix of the local fluctuation going away, combined with the global leveling out of temperatures that hit around then (driven by a couple of big volcanic eruptions, and a big up-tick in industrial pollution).</p>
<p>The point of the article is that a slight increase in local temperature back in the 1920&#8217;s caused a big loss of ice cover.  That being the case, the current warming is likely to do some serious damage to the Greenland ice cap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eurotrash</title>
		<link>http://sortingoutscience.net/2007/12/science_in_the_news/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Eurotrash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sortingoutscience.net/2007/12/11/science_in_the_news/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Any idea what caused the spike in global warming in the 20&#039;s? And also what deminished it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea what caused the spike in global warming in the 20&#8217;s? And also what deminished it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
